NYC Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, who has Tourette syndrome, reacts to N-word ‘tic’ outburst at BAFTA awards85%

By Leonard Greene71%

2/24/2026, 12:28:33 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Actor-Observer Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.9% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 889 faulty-reasoning hits from 429 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 77.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (3,084 of 20,182 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the article peer group.

The fallout from a Tourette syndrome advocate blurting the N-word during a presentation by two Black actors at a British entertainment awards ceremony should generate more compassion  for both sides, said New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, who suffers from the condition. 
A day after movie subject John Davidson shouted the racial slur while actors Delroy Lindo and Michael B. Jordan were on stage at the British Academy of Film and Television Arts awards, Williams said the circumstances were very complex, and that the way to turn down the heat is with more understanding. 
“It is fair to ask him why that word, and he should provide an answer,” said Williams, who has been open about the challenges he has faced over the condition. 
“You have to have care and compassion for John Davidson. 
It’s not something you can control.” 
Williams said the involuntary outbursts, commonly called tics, can be affected by stress or environment, and while there are ways to ease the outbursts, completely controlling them is a struggle. 
If anybody should be blamed for the controversy, it should be BAFTA organizers, Williams said. 
The ceremony is shown in Britain on a two-hour delay, plenty of time to edit out offensive language, which was not done. 
Williams said there might have been a more sinister motive. 
“I’m concerned that the reason they weren’t more sensitive is so they could get the publicity,” Williams said. 
“I don’t think that’s exercising compassion.” 
Davidson is the subject of a British film, “I Swear,” which documents Davidson’s life with Tourette syndrome. 
Ceremony organizers had warned audience members about the possibility of Tourette outbursts, and later apologized for Davidson’s comments. 
Davidson himself later apologized for his comments, and said he voluntarily left the auditorium after his outbursts. 
“I am, and always have been, deeply mortified if anyone considers my involuntary tics to be intentional or to carry any meaning,” Davidson, 54, said in his statement. 
“I chose to leave the auditorium early into the ceremony as I was aware of the distress my tics were causing.” 
Davidson, who also cursed loudly during the ceremony, offered no explanation about why he used the N-word. 
There's a lot of gray here,” Williams said. 
“Sometimes that gray is a bright red, and BAFTA was a bright red moment.” 
Williams said he, too, had used the N-word during tics, and was also at a loss to explain himself. 
”This has nothing to do with acceptability,” he said. 
“I know the word causes harm.” 
Williams, 49, said he was diagnosed with Tourette Syndrome 30 years ago. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.4%Leonard Greene: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.1%Leonard Greene: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 28.9%Leonard Greene: 6.8%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect28.9%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Leonard Greene: 1.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias2.3%This article: 10.5%Leonard Greene: 8.8%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias10.5%This article: 11.4%Leonard Greene: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias11.4%This article: 7.7%Leonard Greene: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error7.7%This article: 23.1%Leonard Greene: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias23.1%This article: 17.0%Leonard Greene: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias17.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 8.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.1%Leonard Greene: 2.6%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority13.1%This article: 3.5%Leonard Greene: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma3.5%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.4%Leonard Greene: 3.0%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization1.4%This article: 5.6%Leonard Greene: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring5.6%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 35.9%Leonard Greene: 14.3%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion35.9%This article: 2.3%Leonard Greene: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 4.2%Leonard Greene: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.2%This article: 4.4%Leonard Greene: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque4.4%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.4%Leonard Greene: 2.7%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal4.4%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.9%Leonard Greene: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.9%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.1%Leonard Greene: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground12.1%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 7.9%Leonard Greene: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading7.9%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 5.3%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leonard Greene: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

429 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.