Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Letlow results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 506 hits . Analysis detected 2,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,079 of 16,562 topics). This Julia Letlow is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. Julia Letlow
Topic details
Total words: 3,444
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst