Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Letlow results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 506 hits. Analysis detected 2,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,079 of 16,562 topics). This Julia Letlow is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Julia Letlow
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos