Topic summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 971 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Threats results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 697 hits . Analysis detected 6,376 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,884 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,466 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Threats is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Judicial Threats
Topic details
Total words: 3,884
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.0% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst