Antifa Is Now Threatening to Kill the Federal Judges Who Sent Members to Prison for 450 Years ⁠89%

By Amy Curtis⁠89%

7/1/2026, 5:00:59 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 468 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 81.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (2,562 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the article peer group.

The Left pretends Antifa isn't a real thing, ignoring the very real violence and property damage done in the name of the organization. 
The Trump administration has declared Antifa a terrorist organization, both domestically and internationally. 
Back in March, several members of Antifa were convicted of numerous crimes stemming from an ambush at an ICE facility in Texas that saw one law enforcement officer shot. 
They were recently sentenced to a combined 450 years behind bars. 
Their violent comrades are not happy about this, and are now threatening the federal judges who sentenced them. 
Here's more from Ngo: 
Far-left extremists are making violent death threats against two federal Texas judges after they handed down long prison sentences to convicted members of a North Texas Antifa terror cell. 
The threats followed last week’s first batch of sentencing where eight convicts received prison terms ranging from 30 years to 100 years after becoming the first defendants convicted in a federal Antifa terrorism case in U.S. history. 
The threats are being directed at U.S. 
District Judge Mark T. 
Pittman and Chief U.S. 
District Judge Reed O’Connor. 
Many of the threats were responses to updates on social media platform Bluesky from the DFW Support Committee, the far-left group that has been organizing support and cash donations for the defendants. 
“So, when are we burning it all down?” 
asked one user under an alias. 
“He has an address,” referring to Judge O’Connor. 
Clearly, more charges and lengthy prison sentences are necessary. 
The more of them we lock up, the better society is. 
A long, long time. 
This insanity ends when the foot-soldier activists start feeling the real consequences. 
We also need to go after those who are funding this. 
That's the guy from CNN who said he could find no examples of Leftist violence. 
Weird. 
Their policies and agenda are so bad they have to enact them at the barrel of a gun. 
That is projection, and it's what the Left uses to justify violence against conservatives and anyone who doesn't kowtow to them. 
There is no excuse for this violence, and no reason why the perpetrators of this violence shouldn't be arrested and imprisoned for as long as possible. 
They are now threatening federal judges for holding their comrades accountable for shooting a law enforcement officer, and it's clear Antifa believes they are above the law. 
They must learn they are not, and that this violence has consequences. 
Editor’s Note: The American people overwhelmingly support President Trump’s law and order agenda. 
Help us fight back against the Democrats and Soros-backed DAs that refuse to enforce our laws to hold criminals accountable. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.2%Amy Curtis: 8.6%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.9%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 3.8%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.7%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.5%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 2.1%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Amy Curtis: 10.8%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.4%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 1.0%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Amy Curtis: 2.8%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias7.1%This article: 38.7%Amy Curtis: 15.5%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias38.7%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.6%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Amy Curtis: 3.8%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error5.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 15.4%Amy Curtis: 4.7%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias15.4%This article: 11.3%Amy Curtis: 6.0%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.7%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.3%Amy Curtis: 1.2%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias10.3%This article: 7.9%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect7.9%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Amy Curtis: 8.3%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem3.2%This article: 4.9%Amy Curtis: 4.3%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man4.9%This article: 6.0%Amy Curtis: 4.2%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority6.0%This article: 5.6%Amy Curtis: 2.6%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma5.6%This article: 9.2%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope9.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.8%Amy Curtis: 16.6%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization12.8%This article: 6.8%Amy Curtis: 0.9%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring6.8%This article: 2.8%Amy Curtis: 1.6%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon2.8%This article: 18.6%Amy Curtis: 9.9%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion18.6%This article: 7.7%Amy Curtis: 2.9%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question7.7%This article: 14.1%Amy Curtis: 2.9%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 1.5%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.5%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof10.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.4%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division2.4%This article: 6.2%Amy Curtis: 2.7%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal6.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.2%Amy Curtis: 2.3%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.2%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.2%This article: 0.9%Amy Curtis: 0.4%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.9%This article: 4.5%Amy Curtis: 0.6%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy4.5%This article: 7.9%Amy Curtis: 4.4%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote7.9%This article: 1.7%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 32.9%Amy Curtis: 24.5%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice32.9%This article: 26.9%Amy Curtis: 8.1%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination26.9%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 22.0%Amy Curtis: 22.0%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias22.0%This article: 10.0%Amy Curtis: 6.1%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.0%

468 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers9.2%attributed speech425writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageNgo • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageTownhall VIP • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ngo

100%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words67% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+98.1 ptsWriter: 1.9%Ngo: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +82.6 ptsWriter: 17.4%Ngo: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-36.2 ptsWriter: 36.2%Ngo: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-29.6 ptsWriter: 29.6%Ngo: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.8 ptsWriter: 7.8%Ngo: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Ngo: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.