Topic summary
57%8 analyzed articles/videos6,245 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Review results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 8,188 hits. Analysis detected 45,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,805 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,719 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Review is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Judicial Review

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles39.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.6%20.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate