Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Reform Protests results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 1,350 hits. Analysis detected 8,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,418 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,143 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Reform Protests is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Judicial Reform Protests
Topic details
Total words: 5,418
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.0% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 10.9%10.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos