Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jpmorgan results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 1,111 hits. Analysis detected 5,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (6,514 of 15,144 topics). This Jpmorgan is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Jpmorgan
Topic details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.0%25.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos