Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Kenton results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 1,456 hits . Analysis detected 7,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,173 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (2,939 of 6,136 authors). This Luke Kenton is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Luke Kenton
Author details
Total words: 7,173
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 3.8% 3.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst