Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Reinl results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Burden of Proof , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 1,111 hits . Analysis detected 5,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,077 of 6,138 authors). This James Reinl is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. James Reinl
Author details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.0% 25.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst