Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jon Boutcher results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Jon Boutcher is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jon Boutcher
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,768
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos