Topic summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Job Cuts results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 2,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,115 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,989 of 16,562 topics). This Job Cuts is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Job Cuts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,115
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos