Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Epstein Investigation results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 624 hits. Analysis detected 2,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,718 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,178 of 16,558 topics). This Jeffrey Epstein Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Jeffrey Epstein Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 1,718
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.8% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.3%36.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.8%20.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos