Topic summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Epstein Case results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 735 hits. Analysis detected 4,565 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,191 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,825 of 16,562 topics). This Jeffrey Epstein Case is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Jeffrey Epstein Case
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.5%17.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos