Topic summary
⁠63%2 analyzed articles/videos754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Japanese Cinema results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 930 hits. Analysis detected 4,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,869 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,969 of 16,562 topics). This Japanese Cinema is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Japanese Cinema
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,869
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos