Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jeff Ewing results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 412 hits . Analysis detected 2,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,607 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Jeff Ewing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jeff Ewing
Author details
Total words: 2,607
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.6% 14.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.7%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst