Topic summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Smith results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 491 hits. Analysis detected 3,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,053 of 16,562 topics). This Jack Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Jack Smith
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos