Topic summary
79% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Hamas War results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 4,626 hits . Analysis detected 18,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,156 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,258 of 15,666 topics). This Israel Hamas War is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Israel Hamas War
Topic details
Total words: 16,156
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst