Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Gaza War results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 717 hits. Analysis detected 4,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,762 of 16,562 topics). This Israel Gaza War is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Israel Gaza War
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.1% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos