Topic summary
67%4 analyzed articles/videos2,285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Gaza Conflict results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,570 hits. Analysis detected 11,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,941 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (8,994 of 16,562 topics). This Israel Gaza Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Israel Gaza Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 9,941
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate