Topic summary
⁠64%4 analyzed articles/videos2,845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel And Palestine results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 2,309 hits. Analysis detected 14,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,088 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,733 of 16,562 topics). This Israel And Palestine is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Israel And Palestine
Topic details
Total words: 9,088
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.4%25.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.0%14.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos