Author summary
54% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Gittos results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 1,160 hits . Analysis detected 7,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,875 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,539 of 6,348 authors). This Luke Gittos is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Luke Gittos
Author details
Total words: 5,875
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.7% 19.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst