Author summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Limor Simhony Philpott results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 1,376 hits . Analysis detected 9,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,851 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,941 of 6,345 authors). This Limor Simhony Philpott is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Limor Simhony Philpott
Author details
Total words: 5,851
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.6% 17.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.9% 14.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 9.4% 9.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.5% 14.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst