Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 831 hits . Analysis detected 8,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,648 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,847 of 16,562 topics). This Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
Topic details
Total words: 8,648
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst