Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Iran War Updates results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 676 faulty-reasoning hits from 570 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Iran War Updates is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Iran War Updates
Topic details
Total words: 570
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles570 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 15.1%15.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.9%18.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.6%29.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 13.2%13.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos