Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,057 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran US Tensions results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 2,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,171 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,231 of 16,562 topics). This Iran US Tensions is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Iran US Tensions
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,171
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos