Topic summary
78% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Tensions results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 3,523 hits . Analysis detected 18,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,361 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,019 of 15,447 topics). This Iran Tensions is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Iran Tensions
Topic details
Total words: 13,361
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.1% percentile 2.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 26.4% 26.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst