Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Iran Deal results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 731 hits. Analysis detected 3,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,568 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Iran Deal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Iran Deal
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,568
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.5%20.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos