Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ipo results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 838 hits . Analysis detected 5,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,141 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,542 of 16,562 topics). This Ipo is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Ipo
Topic details
Total words: 5,141
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 4.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst