Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,310 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investment Risks results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 535 hits. Analysis detected 5,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,578 of 16,562 topics). This Investment Risks is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Investment Risks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.3%7.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos