Topic summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video1,818 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Internet Trends results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 2,122 hits. Analysis detected 9,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,372 of 16,562 topics). This Internet Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Internet Trends
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠62%Internet Trends (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 29.2%29.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.8%17.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos