Topic summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Waterways results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 796 hits. Analysis detected 3,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,849 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,675 of 16,562 topics). This International Waterways is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
International Waterways
Topic details
Total words: 3,849
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.7% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.7%4.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos