Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalia Penza results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 499 hits. Analysis detected 1,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (713 of 6,263 authors). This Natalia Penza is worse (more manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Natalia Penza
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠89%Natalia Penza (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,016
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510088.6% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 24.8%24.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.3%5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 22.3%22.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos