Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These International Terrorism results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 962 hits. Analysis detected 5,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,018 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,689 topics). This International Terrorism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
International Terrorism
Topic details
Total words: 3,018
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.9%31.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.8%13.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos