Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video1,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Stability results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 1,084 hits. Analysis detected 6,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,077 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,012 of 16,562 topics). This International Stability is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
International Stability
Topic details
Total words: 4,077
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.6%19.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.6%16.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.6%26.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos