Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Challenges results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 50 faulty-reasoning hits from 165 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,251 of 15,746 topics). This International Challenges is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
International Challenges
Topic details
Total words: 165
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510092.1% percentile
10.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles165 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.2%15.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos