Topic summary
70% 19 analyzed articles/videos 25,452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Affairs results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 9,192 hits . Analysis detected 99,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 122,001 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,089 of 15,359 topics). This International Affairs is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. International Affairs
Topic details
Total words: 122,001
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score19 analyzed articles122K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst