Topic summary
⁠80%3 analyzed articles/videos1,841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intellectual Property Theft results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 769 hits. Analysis detected 5,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,523 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,148 of 16,562 topics). This Intellectual Property Theft is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Intellectual Property Theft
Topic details
Total words: 5,523
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos