Topic summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Insulin results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 1,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,961 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,343 of 16,562 topics). This Insulin is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Insulin
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,961
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos