Topic summary
⁠32%3 analyzed articles/videos1,212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Influencer results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 426 hits. Analysis detected 3,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,858 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,206 of 16,562 topics). This Influencer is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Influencer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,858
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos