Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indycar results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 924 hits. Analysis detected 3,193 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,375 of 16,559 topics). This Indycar is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Indycar
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,800
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 51.3%51.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 51.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos