OutKick97%

How Did I Not See The Footage Of George Lucas Crashing In A Celebrity Pro/Am Race Until Now?! 91%

By Matt Reigle91%

4/15/2026, 9:50:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 78.7% saturation with 354 hits. Analysis detected 1,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 450 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,066 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the article peer group.

IndyCar is headed to Southern California this weekend for the Grand Prix of Long Beach, one of the series' marquee street races. 
It's a great weekend that also sees the IMSA WeatherTech Sportscar series hitting the track, but unfortunately, one of the coolest things about Long Beach has been MIA for years, and that's the Toyota Pro/Celebrity Race, which was retired back in 2016. 
Now, I thought I knew a lot about that race. 
Alfonso Ribiero is a monster behind the wheel and won a bunch of times, Adam Carolla won the race as a celebrity and as a pro driver, and actor-turned-NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series driver Frankie Muniz won the race in 2004. 
But how did I not know until just now that George Lucas had an absolutely massive crash when he competed in the race back in 2007? 
I'm a big George Lucas guy, and by that I mean I like George Lucas, the guy. 
I like that he sold Star Wars for a bazillion dollars and still rolls around in the same flannel shirts while Disney ruins his creation. 
The man just does what he wants, however he wants to do it. 
I respect the hell out of that. 
I also like that he's into racing, and you can spot him in the back of F1 garages on occasion. 
So, given his interest in racing  I mean, he did invent podracing  it's no surprise that Lucas would be down to do some real racing. 
On Tuesday, the SPEED on FOX account (which you should check out if you're a motorsports fan) posted a clip of Lucas' race, and it's just plain wild. 
Alright, we need to unpack that… 
First of all, look at the bodywork hanging off Lucas' Scion TC (remember Scion?!). 
The man races hard, and you know how I know that? 
Because, even with a car as damaged as that, he still decided to try and be the last of the late brakers by just totally bombing into the corner like that car didn't even have brakes. 
Which, again, given the damage, maybe it didn't at that point. 
Then he goes into the tires hard, and takes a hefty front impact from another driver, and, better yet, gives them the "What the f--k?!" 
hands. 
George Lucas is the man. 
Let's see JJ Abrams do that! 
This race needs to come back. 
I mean, just think of the content that we'd get out of one of the Real Housewives of Schenectady trading paint with one of the Baha Men, or whatever. 
It would be gold, Jerry. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.4%Matt Reigle: 6.4%Outkick: 8.8%Confirmation Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.9%Outkick: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Matt Reigle: 5.9%Outkick: 5.3%Availability Heuristic15.1%This article: 6.0%Matt Reigle: 2.3%Outkick: 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 9.8%Matt Reigle: 1.4%Outkick: 1.9%Hindsight Bias9.8%This article: 2.2%Matt Reigle: 5.8%Outkick: 6.1%Overconfidence Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 10.8%Outkick: 12.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.3%Matt Reigle: 2.0%Outkick: 1.3%Status Quo Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.9%Matt Reigle: 5.4%Outkick: 4.4%Optimism Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Outkick: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.4%Matt Reigle: 9.2%Outkick: 12.8%Negativity Bias20.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 4.3%Outkick: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Matt Reigle: 2.0%Outkick: 3.2%Fundamental Attribution Error8.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Outkick: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Matt Reigle: 8.4%Outkick: 5.1%In-Group Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Outkick: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Matt Reigle: 6.9%Outkick: 5.2%Halo Effect13.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.3%Outkick: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.0%Matt Reigle: 4.2%Outkick: 3.4%Recency Bias12.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.6%Outkick: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Matt Reigle: 2.2%Outkick: 4.0%Ad Hominem5.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.7%Outkick: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.2%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Outkick: 3.6%Appeal to Authority6.2%This article: 1.3%Matt Reigle: 2.1%Outkick: 2.3%False Dilemma1.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Outkick: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.4%Matt Reigle: 11.1%Outkick: 11.5%Hasty Generalization2.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.1%Outkick: 1.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.9%Outkick: 2.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.9%Matt Reigle: 10.3%Outkick: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion16.9%This article: 2.4%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Outkick: 1.7%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 1.2%Outkick: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.3%Outkick: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 6.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 0.3%Appeal to Nature6.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.2%Outkick: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 33.3%Matt Reigle: 6.8%Outkick: 4.3%Anecdotal33.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Outkick: 0.4%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.0%Matt Reigle: 1.5%Outkick: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 9.8%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Outkick: 0.7%Personal Incredulity9.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 1.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.0%Outkick: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Matt Reigle: 2.2%Outkick: 2.1%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 1.3%Matt Reigle: 1.0%Outkick: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.3%This article: 78.7%Matt Reigle: 19.7%Outkick: 18.0%Biased Writer Voice78.7%This article: 1.3%Matt Reigle: 1.5%Outkick: 2.4%Indoctrination1.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Reigle: 0.1%Outkick: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Matt Reigle: 0.5%Outkick: 2.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.6%This article: 6.2%Matt Reigle: 2.9%Outkick: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.2%

450 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.