Topic summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Industrial Emissions results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Indoctrination , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 246 hits . Analysis detected 2,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,727 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,977 of 16,562 topics). This Industrial Emissions is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Industrial Emissions
Topic details
Total words: 2,727
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst