Topic summary
⁠53%5 analyzed articles/videos2,507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Income Inequality results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 2,268 hits. Analysis detected 21,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,009 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,464 of 15,738 topics). This Income Inequality is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Income Inequality
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles20K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos