Topic summary
⁠23%3 analyzed articles/videos1,894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigrant Experience results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 1,335 hits. Analysis detected 9,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,921 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (15,001 of 15,765 topics). This Immigrant Experience is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Immigrant Experience
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751004.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos