Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Identifying Non-Natives results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 867 hits. Analysis detected 2,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,435 of 16,562 topics). This Identifying Non-Natives is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Identifying Non-Natives
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠80%Identifying Non-Natives (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,232
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.3% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 38.8%38.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 10.4%10.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Topic 38.8%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos