Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Safety results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.1% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 1,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (710 of 16,086 topics). This Ice Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Ice Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 780
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.6% percentile
13.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles780 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 34.9%34.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 27.8%27.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 37.2%37.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 40.1%40.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.1%14.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.5%15.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.7%14.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 9.5%9.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 40.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 37.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 34.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos