Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hybrid Vehicles results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 618 hits. Analysis detected 4,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,400 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,850 of 16,562 topics). This Hybrid Vehicles is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Hybrid Vehicles
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,400
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.7%17.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos