Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nora Eckert results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 559 hits . Analysis detected 3,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (798 of 6,628 authors). This Nora Eckert is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Nora Eckert
Author details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.0% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.5% 11.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 12.7% 12.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.2% 8.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.6% 10.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 25.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.5%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst