Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Spaceflight results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 536 hits. Analysis detected 2,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,048 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,427 of 16,562 topics). This Human Spaceflight is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Human Spaceflight
Topic details
Total words: 5,048
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos