Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Judiciary Committee results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 1,371 hits. Analysis detected 7,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,443 of 15,341 topics). This House Judiciary Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
House Judiciary Committee
Topic details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.9%30.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.0%10.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos